Music history is littered with over-reaching  statements bearing no relation to hard fact.
  
 John Lennon claimed, at the height of The Beatles'  fame, that they were bigger than Jesus. Keeping up his own Fabs-robbing legacy,  Noel Gallagher later went one better, saying Oasis were bigger than the  Messiah's own daddy.
  
 Paul Weller, upon hearing that John Peel had  declared The White Stripes' Jack White to be "the new Hendrix" responded by  saying "That old cunt should know better".
  
 And though he was a fictional comedy character,  Alan Partridge's assertion that Wings were "the band The Beatles could have  been" can never be forgotten.
  
 So today, when I state that Take That are as close  as this generation may get to having its own Beatles, my tongue is only  partially in my cheek. And my second assertion, that Take That are the live band  The Beatles could have been, will no doubt be ridiculed.
  
 When Mrs Wife's friend had to pull out of attending  the last of Take That's three Glasgow concerts on Sunday, I was drafted in as a  last minute substitute. I had no qualms about attending, but said all along that  I would rather see a genuine fan take the ticket. But when no such fan could be  found at such short notice, I made the trip to Hampden, little more than a week  before I'm due to go there to see AC/DC.
  
 We made the mistake of entering the stadium when  the gates opened at 4pm, unaware that opening act Gary Go wasn't due onstage  until around 7pm. As a result, we spent far too long standing in the heat and in  the midst of a crowd that wasn't so much moshpit as menopause pit.
  
 But enough of the preamble - why am I making  ridiculous claims that Take That are this generation's Beatles?
  
 Firstly, the show itself. Based around a Circus  theme, in tribute to the band's latest album of the same name, I have never seen  such a vast and complex set up for a gig. I've seen stadium gigs by The Rolling  Stones, The Eagles, Bon Jovi, Oasis and U2, but the shows put on by all of those  members of the stadium rock elite pale into near insignificance when compared  with the sheer scale of Take That's Circus. A troupe of dancers, jugglers,  trapeze artists, acrobats, tightrope walkers and other assorted circus  performers formed an intricate part of the show. As did a full-size mechanical  elephant that rose from the second stage.
  
 The opening sequence saw these circus performers  take a long walk from the main stage to the second stage, evoking a psychedelic  take on a Victorian circus that brought to mind The Beatles' work around 1967 -  think Being For The Benefit Of Mr Kite turned into a Yellow Submarine-style live  action movie and you're getting close.
  
 Amongst all this hoo-ha, a vast cloud of balloons  made its way to the second stage, and at the crescendo of this introduction, the  balloons rose to reveal the four members of Take That dressed in black  militaristic uniforms that fell somewhere between those worn by The Beatles on  the cover of Sgt Pepper and those sported by My Chemical Romance in their Black  Parade phase.
  
 And it's that showmanship that leads me to my claim  that Take That are the live band The Beatles could have been.
  
 If, instead of splitting, The Beatles had gone the  way of the Rolling Stones and become a massive globe-touring stadium band, I can  imagine that their show, or sections of it at least, would be similar to what  Take That put on for Circus - pageantary, the idea of making a show a real  event, a huge psychedelic video screen as a backdrop and a lot of matey,  self-deprecating banter.
  
 So perhaps you'll forgive the comparison - is it so  difficult to imagine The Beatles, had history played out differently, playing to  a million people in the space of a month on a UK stadium tour, backed by one of  the most lavish stages ever built?
  
 But that still leaves my second claim unanswered -  that Take That, musically, could be as close as this generation will get to a  Beatles of its own.
  
 First off, I don't mean for a second that Take That  have anything like the genius of The Beatles.
  
 But few bands ever rise to a stage where they can  play to packed stadia night after night. And while there were definitely  considerably more women in Hampden last night, there was also a substantial  number of men - all of whom, I'd imagine, could probably name 10 or more Take  That songs (and, dare I say it, sing along).
  
 The only other British band of a similar age group  to Take That with the ability to effortlessly fill stadia and have all 55,000  people sing along with their songs is Oasis. But Oasis perhaps don't have the  same across the board appeal - you can't imagine two parents taking their  primary school age son and daughter to see Oasis, can you?
  
 And so it comes to pass that I, a massive Beatles  fan who should definitely know better, have just spent a rather lengthy blog  post discussing Take That without actually mentioning any of their music -  including the rather special Back For Good and Shine, both of which could  probably slot fairly comfortably into The Beatles' back catalogue - and reaching  the conclusion that they're the post-Millenial Beatles.
  
 I'm blaming the Scottish summer  sunshine....